
CFE exam practice question: daily practice for the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) exam — domain: Law.
Question
During a corporate fraud investigation, a federal prosecutor offers an employee immunity for any testimony she provides to encourage cooperation against a former manager. Which statement best describes the legal effect of this type of immunity?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: B. Prosecutors may not use her testimony or evidence derived from it to prosecute her, but may pursue charges based on independent evidence.
The correct answer is that prosecutors cannot use the witness’s testimony or derivative evidence to prosecute her, but they may bring charges if they have independent, preexisting evidence. This describes use and derivative-use immunity. Option A describes transactional (or total) immunity, which bars prosecution for the transaction entirely and is broader. Option C is incorrect because use immunity does not shield a witness from civil suits or from prosecution based on independent proof. Option D is wrong because, while immunity grants are typically documented (often by court order), the defining legal effect depends on the scope of the immunity granted, not solely on a written formality.
Want more practice?
Prepare for the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) exam with New Material: CFE 2026 Prep Bundle.
