
CFE exam practice question: daily practice for the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) exam — domain: Law.
Question
After an internal audit uncovers potentially fraudulent vendor payments, the company's security manager (a private employee) asks an accounts-payable clerk to meet in a conference room for questioning. HR sits in; the manager does not explicitly tell the clerk they may leave. Which statement about Miranda warnings is most accurate?
Show the answer and explanation
Correct answer: A. Miranda warnings are not required because company investigators are private actors and Miranda applies only to custodial interrogation by government agents.
The best answer is that Miranda does not generally apply to interviews conducted by private company investigators because Miranda protections arise from custodial interrogation by government actors. The presence of HR or the failure to tell the employee they may leave does not by itself convert a private interview into a government custodial interrogation. However, if the private interviewer is acting as an agent of law enforcement or statements are elicited after the person becomes effectively in police custody, Miranda can become necessary. Option B is wrong because custody requires government restraint; Option C is wrong because HR involvement alone does not trigger Miranda; Option D is wrong because Miranda can apply outside a formal arrest if custodial interrogation by government agents occurs.
Want more practice?
Prepare for the Certified Fraud Examiner (CFE) exam with New Material: CFE 2026 Prep Bundle.
